Obscenity: You'll Know if When You See It

Never have I thought of an automobile as obscene. Until now. The Automobile Section for the August 29, 2010 Sunday edition of The New York Times contains a review of the 2010 Mercedes Benz E63 AMG. This car is nothing less than offensive. The $100,000 price tag isn't shocking. However, the car "burns $1 in gas every three or four miles" which translates to 9.5 miles per gallon. Is the Mercedes-Benz marketing team living in a cave?

I am not necessarily an ardent environmentalist, but I can't imagine what prompted development of this obscene machine. The market, high end included, clearly is interested in using less fuel, not more. Production of the E63 is absurd in the current climate. I can't imagine what the folks at Mercedes-Benz had in mind. I would imagine that some potential customers might think twice about purchasing a Mercedes-Benz at all. It definitely will impact my decision, and I happen to be in the market for a car.

In Jacobelis v. Ohio, 378 U.S.184 (1964), Justice Potter Stewart wrote a minority decision in a case deciding whether a particular film was "hardcore pornography." Justice Stewart stated that he could not intelligibly define hardcore pornography, but he would 'know it when he saw it.' There probably won't be many E63s on the road. However, if you happen to see one, think of Justice Stewart's statement.